<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blog rage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dougthompson.com/archives/850/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dougthompson.com/archives/850</link>
	<description>Comforting the Afflicted and Afflicting the Comfortable</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 03:06:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Pecor</title>
		<link>http://www.dougthompson.com/archives/850#comment-417</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Pecor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dougthompson.com/?p=850#comment-417</guid>
		<description>I think a blog is largely a digital platform for conversations that might otherwise take place during a dinner among family, friends and acquaintances. I&#039;d think at the very least, 95% of active blogs are of this nature. Take &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pecorfamily.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;mine&lt;/a&gt; - you won&#039;t find any journalism there :) The other 5% in my experience are mostly opinion pieces with a sprinkling of journalism.

Social currency gets distributed very quickly through blogs. I think this makes it a valuable tool for the journalist with strict ethical standards. It also makes it a valuable tool for bullshit artists or opportunists. Overall though, factual social currency seems to have much longer legs. It reminds me of that old saying. An idiot with a computer is a faster, better idiot.

Sean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a blog is largely a digital platform for conversations that might otherwise take place during a dinner among family, friends and acquaintances. I&#8217;d think at the very least, 95% of active blogs are of this nature. Take <a href="http://www.pecorfamily.com" rel="nofollow">mine</a> &#8211; you won&#8217;t find any journalism there <img src='http://www.dougthompson.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  The other 5% in my experience are mostly opinion pieces with a sprinkling of journalism.</p>
<p>Social currency gets distributed very quickly through blogs. I think this makes it a valuable tool for the journalist with strict ethical standards. It also makes it a valuable tool for bullshit artists or opportunists. Overall though, factual social currency seems to have much longer legs. It reminds me of that old saying. An idiot with a computer is a faster, better idiot.</p>
<p>Sean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cindy lee</title>
		<link>http://www.dougthompson.com/archives/850#comment-418</link>
		<dc:creator>cindy lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dougthompson.com/?p=850#comment-418</guid>
		<description>I use my blog as an on-line journel.  I think that is what most people use it for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use my blog as an on-line journel.  I think that is what most people use it for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

